Kentucky vs Massachusetts: Business Hiring Cost Comparison (2026)
A $60K employee costs $65,340 in Kentucky and $65,949 in Massachusetts. Kentucky saves $609/year per hire.
Kentucky is $609 per year cheaper than Massachusetts for a $60,000 employee in 2026, with total employer costs of $65,340 vs $65,949 including all mandatory payroll taxes.
Share This Page
At a $60,000 salary
Kentucky saves $609/employee/year
$65,340 in Kentucky vs $65,949 in Massachusetts
Kentucky
$65,340
1.09x salary
Massachusetts
$65,949
1.1x salary
Shareable Insights
$6,090/yr for a 10-person team
Same salaries, same roles. Just Kentucky instead of Massachusetts.
SUTA accounts for 37% of the gap
$225 difference in SUTA alone between these states.
Massachusetts adds $204 in mandatory programs
Disability insurance and paid family leave that Kentucky doesn't require.
Cost Breakdown Comparison
Based on $60,000 annual salary
| Cost Component | KY | MA | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Salary | $60,000 | $60,000 | — |
| Social Security (6.2%) | $3,720 | $3,720 | — |
| Medicare (1.45%) | $870 | $870 | — |
| FUTA (0.6%) | $42 | $42 | — |
| SUTA (State Unemployment) | $120 | $345 | -$225 |
| Workers' Compensation | $588 | $768 | -$180 |
| State-Mandated Insurance | $0 | $204 | -$204 |
| Total Employer Cost | $65,340 | $65,949 | -$609 |
Tax Rate Comparison
| Rate | Kentucky | Massachusetts |
|---|---|---|
| SUTA Rate Range | 0.1% – 9.0% | 0.56% – 8.4% |
| SUTA Typical Rate | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| SUTA Wage Base | $12,000 | $15,000 |
| Workers' Comp Rate | 0.98% | 1.28% |
| State Income Tax | Yes | Yes |
| Paid Family Leave | Not required | 0.34% |
What This Means for Employers
For a business hiring at a $60,000 salary, choosing Kentucky over Massachusetts saves $609 per employee per year in employer-side payroll costs alone. For a team of 10, that's $6,090 annually — enough to fund an additional hire or significantly offset operating costs.
The biggest difference comes from SUTA (state unemployment tax) — Kentucky charges 1.0% on the first $12,000 vs Massachusetts's 2.3% on $15,000. The rate difference of 1.3 percentage points is significant because SUTA is levied on every employee and adjusts annually based on your unemployment claims history. Federal taxes — Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), and FUTA (0.6%) — are identical in both states and account for the majority of employer tax burden.
A notable difference between these states is mandatory benefit programs. Massachusetts requires employer contributions to paid family leave programs that Kentucky does not mandate — adding $204 per employee annually.
These numbers reflect employer-side costs only and don't include benefits, overhead, or the employee's own tax burden. Use the interactive Employee Cost Calculator to model different salary levels and benefits packages.
Choosing Between Kentucky and Massachusetts?
Cost alone favors Kentucky: At a $60K salary, you save $609 per employee — a real number that compounds across a growing team. At 20 employees, that's $12,180/year before factoring in any raises.
When Massachusetts might still make sense: If your business depends on talent concentrated in Massachusetts — tech workers, finance professionals, specialized trades — the labor market access may outweigh the payroll cost premium. Remote-friendly roles, however, make the $609/employee savings a strong argument for Kentucky-based registration.
What this comparison doesn't capture: State income tax (employee side) affects your offer competitiveness — employees in high-tax states need higher gross pay to net the same take-home. Kentucky has state income tax; Massachusetts has state income tax. This affects what salary you need to offer to attract equivalent candidates.
State Employment Profiles
Kentucky
Kentucky has a moderate employer tax profile with low SUTA rate and $12,000 wage base, plus notably low workers' compensation rates compared to neighboring states.
automotive assembly (Toyota HQ for North America), bourbon distilling, healthcare
Toyota's Georgetown facility has driven decades of supplier development; automotive accounts for over 20% of Kentucky's manufacturing output.
Massachusetts
Massachusetts has a high employer tax profile with a $15,000 SUTA wage base and mandatory paid family leave contributions, offset by one of the highest-educated workforces in the country.
biotechnology & life sciences, financial services, higher education
The Route 128 biotech corridor and Cambridge's Kendall Square drive premium wages in life sciences and tech; total employment cost per worker is among the highest in the Northeast.
Employer Environment in Each State
Key factors that shape employer costs beyond the numbers above
- State income tax applies — factor into total compensation packages
- Low SUTA rate (1.0% on $12,000 wage base) — below-average unemployment insurance cost
- Workers' comp rate 0.98% — near national average, varies by industry classification
- State income tax applies — factor into total compensation packages
- SUTA rate 2.3% (wage base $15,000) — in line with national average
- Workers' comp rate 1.28% — near national average, varies by industry classification
- State paid family leave program (0.34% employer share) — additional mandatory payroll cost
Hiring Strategy Takeaway
The $609 per-employee cost gap at $60K salary is primarily driven by SUTA rates (KY: 1.0% vs MA: 2.3%). For a growing business, this difference compounds quickly — a 10-person team in Kentucky costs $6,090 less annually than the same team in Massachusetts, before accounting for benefits, overhead, or salary-level differences.
Explore Each State
Cost Comparison at Different Salary Levels
How the gap changes from $30K to $150K
| Salary | KY Total | MA Total | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30,000 | $32,751 | $33,168 | -$417 |
| $40,000 | $43,614 | $44,095 | -$481 |
| $50,000 | $54,477 | $55,022 | -$545 |
| $60,000 | $65,340 | $65,949 | -$609 |
| $75,000 | $81,635 | $82,340 | -$705 |
| $100,000 | $108,792 | $109,657 | -$865 |
| $125,000 | $135,950 | $136,975 | -$1,025 |
| $150,000 | $163,107 | $164,292 | -$1,185 |
Click any amount to see the full cost breakdown for that salary and state. Amounts shown from the perspective of KY.
What About Startup Costs?
Hiring is one piece. See what it costs to actually open in these states.
Kentucky
Massachusetts
Simplify Payroll in Kentucky and Massachusetts
These providers handle tax calculations, filings, and compliance automatically.
All-in-one payroll, benefits, and HR. Automatically calculates and files federal, state, and local payroll taxes.
Payroll and tax filing for businesses of all sizes with built-in state-specific compliance.
Payroll, HR, and benefits in one platform. Handles multi-state employment and tax filings.
Some links may be affiliate links. CostCrunch may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Get notified when hiring costs change in these states
We track SUTA rates, workers' comp, and payroll taxes across all 50 states. Free updates.
More State Comparisons
Was this calculator helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve CostCrunch
Thank you for your feedback! ✓
Save Your Results
Download a professional PDF report with your complete analysis, charts, and key insights.
Download Your Report
Enter your email to get your personalized PDF report. We'll also send you useful financial tips.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
More Business Calculators
Break-Even Calculator
Find how many units to sell to cover costs
Employee Cost Calculator
Find the true cost of hiring an employee
Startup Cost Estimator
Estimate one-time and recurring startup costs
Profit Margin Calculator
Calculate gross, operating, and net margins
Self-Employment Tax Calculator
Estimate SE tax and quarterly payments for freelancers
Loan Comparison
Compare loan options side by side
Markup & Margin
Convert between markup and margin percentages
Payroll Tax Calculator
Estimate employer payroll taxes by state
Get notified when tax rates change
We monitor payroll tax rates, SUTA, and cost-of-living data across all 50 states. When rates change, we'll let you know. Free, no spam.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe with one click.