Skip to main content

Minnesota vs Texas: Business Hiring Cost Comparison (2026)

A $60K employee costs $65,978 in Minnesota and $65,337 in Texas. Texas saves $641/year per hire.

No signup No tracking Last updated March 2026
Data current as of March 2026 Sources: IRS Publication 15, SSA COLA notices, State Workforce Agencies

Texas is $641 per year cheaper than Minnesota for a $60,000 employee in 2026, with total employer costs of $65,337 vs $65,978 including all mandatory payroll taxes.

Share This Page

$60,000
$30K $200K

At a $60,000 salary

Texas saves $641/employee/year

$65,978 in Minnesota vs $65,337 in Texas

Minnesota

$65,978

1.1x salary

Texas

$65,337

1.09x salary

Shareable Insights

$6,410/yr for a 10-person team

Same salaries, same roles. Just Texas instead of Minnesota.

SUTA accounts for 48% of the gap

$305 difference in SUTA alone between these states.

Minnesota adds $198 in mandatory programs

Disability insurance and paid family leave that Texas doesn't require.

Cost Breakdown Comparison

Based on $60,000 annual salary

Cost Component MN TX Diff
Base Salary $60,000 $60,000
Social Security (6.2%) $3,720 $3,720
Medicare (1.45%) $870 $870
FUTA (0.6%) $42 $42
SUTA (State Unemployment) $440 $135 +$305
Workers' Compensation $708 $570 +$138
State-Mandated Insurance $198 $0 +$198
Total Employer Cost $65,978 $65,337 +$641

Tax Rate Comparison

Rate Minnesota Texas
SUTA Rate Range 0.1% – 9.0% 0.32% – 6.31%
SUTA Typical Rate 1.0% 1.5%
SUTA Wage Base $44,000 $9,000
Workers' Comp Rate 1.18% 0.95%
State Income Tax Yes No
Paid Family Leave 0.33% Not required

What This Means for Employers

For a business hiring at a $60,000 salary, choosing Texas over Minnesota saves $641 per employee per year in employer-side payroll costs alone. For a team of 10, that's $6,410 annually — enough to fund an additional hire or significantly offset operating costs.

The biggest difference comes from SUTA (state unemployment tax) — Minnesota charges 1.0% on the first $44,000 vs Texas's 1.5% on $9,000. The rate difference of 0.5 percentage points is significant because SUTA is levied on every employee and adjusts annually based on your unemployment claims history. Federal taxes — Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), and FUTA (0.6%) — are identical in both states and account for the majority of employer tax burden.

A notable difference between these states is mandatory benefit programs. Minnesota requires employer contributions to paid family leave programs that Texas does not mandate — adding $198 per employee annually.

These numbers reflect employer-side costs only and don't include benefits, overhead, or the employee's own tax burden. Use the interactive Employee Cost Calculator to model different salary levels and benefits packages.

Choosing Between Minnesota and Texas?

Cost alone favors Texas: At a $60K salary, you save $641 per employee — a real number that compounds across a growing team. At 20 employees, that's $12,820/year before factoring in any raises.

When Minnesota might still make sense: If your business depends on talent concentrated in Minnesota — tech workers, finance professionals, specialized trades — the labor market access may outweigh the payroll cost premium. Remote-friendly roles, however, make the $641/employee savings a strong argument for Texas-based registration.

What this comparison doesn't capture: State income tax (employee side) affects your offer competitiveness — employees in high-tax states need higher gross pay to net the same take-home. Minnesota has state income tax; Texas has no state income tax. This affects what salary you need to offer to attract equivalent candidates.

State Employment Profiles

Minnesota

Minnesota requires employers to contribute to both SUTA (on a $44,000 wage base) and a 0.33% paid family leave program, creating one of the higher employer tax burdens in the Midwest.

Top Industries

healthcare & medical devices (Medtronic), retail (Target, Best Buy), food processing (General Mills)

Employer Note

Minnesota's generous paid family leave program (24 weeks total) is a competitive recruiting tool that many Fortune 500 headquarters use to attract talent from lower-benefit states.

Texas

Texas has no state income tax, a minimal $9,000 SUTA wage base, and no paid family leave or disability insurance mandates — a primary reason it consistently ranks among the lowest employer-cost states.

Top Industries

energy & petrochemicals, technology (Austin/Dallas), financial services

Employer Note

Texas has absorbed massive corporate relocations from California (Tesla, Oracle, HP Enterprise); in Austin especially, California-level compensation expectations have followed these moves.

Employer Environment in Each State

Key factors that shape employer costs beyond the numbers above

Minnesota Below-average employer costs
  • State income tax applies — factor into total compensation packages
  • Low SUTA rate (1.0% on $44,000 wage base) — below-average unemployment insurance cost
  • Workers' comp rate 1.18% — near national average, varies by industry classification
  • State paid family leave program (0.33% employer share) — additional mandatory payroll cost
Texas Below-average employer costs
  • No state income tax — employees keep more of their paycheck, a recruiting advantage
  • SUTA rate 1.5% (wage base $9,000) — in line with national average
  • Workers' comp rate 0.95% — near national average, varies by industry classification

Hiring Strategy Takeaway

The $641 per-employee cost gap at $60K salary is primarily driven by SUTA rates (MN: 1.0% vs TX: 1.5%). Texas's lack of state income tax gives it a recruiting edge — employees take home more pay for equivalent salaries. For a growing business, this difference compounds quickly — a 10-person team in Texas costs $6,410 less annually than the same team in Minnesota, before accounting for benefits, overhead, or salary-level differences.

Cost Comparison at Different Salary Levels

How the gap changes from $30K to $150K

Salary MN Total TX Total Difference
$30,000 $33,090 $32,757 +$333
$40,000 $44,106 $43,617 +$489
$50,000 $55,062 $54,477 +$585
$60,000 $65,978 $65,337 +$641
$75,000 $82,352 $81,627 +$725
$100,000 $109,642 $108,777 +$865
$125,000 $136,932 $135,927 +$1,005
$150,000 $164,222 $163,077 +$1,145

Click any amount to see the full cost breakdown for that salary and state. Amounts shown from the perspective of MN.

What About Startup Costs?

Hiring is one piece. See what it costs to actually open in these states.

Get notified when hiring costs change in these states

We track SUTA rates, workers' comp, and payroll taxes across all 50 states. Free updates.

Estimates only. These results are based on publicly available data and standard formulas. Actual costs may vary based on your specific circumstances. This calculator does not constitute financial, tax, or legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for advice on your situation.

Was this calculator helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve CostCrunch

Save Your Results

Download a professional PDF report with your complete analysis, charts, and key insights.

Get notified when tax rates change

We monitor payroll tax rates, SUTA, and cost-of-living data across all 50 states. When rates change, we'll let you know. Free, no spam.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe with one click.