Texas vs Wisconsin: Business Hiring Cost Comparison (2026)
A $60K employee costs $65,337 in Texas and $65,732 in Wisconsin. Texas saves $395/year per hire.
Texas is $395 per year cheaper than Wisconsin for a $60,000 employee in 2026, with total employer costs of $65,337 vs $65,732 including all mandatory payroll taxes.
Share This Page
At a $60,000 salary
Texas saves $395/employee/year
$65,337 in Texas vs $65,732 in Wisconsin
Texas
$65,337
1.09x salary
Wisconsin
$65,732
1.1x salary
Shareable Insights
SUTA accounts for 65% of the gap
$257 difference in SUTA alone between these states.
Cost Breakdown Comparison
Based on $60,000 annual salary
| Cost Component | TX | WI | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Salary | $60,000 | $60,000 | — |
| Social Security (6.2%) | $3,720 | $3,720 | — |
| Medicare (1.45%) | $870 | $870 | — |
| FUTA (0.6%) | $42 | $42 | — |
| SUTA (State Unemployment) | $135 | $392 | -$257 |
| Workers' Compensation | $570 | $708 | -$138 |
| Total Employer Cost | $65,337 | $65,732 | -$395 |
Tax Rate Comparison
| Rate | Texas | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|
| SUTA Rate Range | 0.32% – 6.31% | 0.0% – 9.0% |
| SUTA Typical Rate | 1.5% | 2.8% |
| SUTA Wage Base | $9,000 | $14,000 |
| Workers' Comp Rate | 0.95% | 1.18% |
| State Income Tax | No | Yes |
What This Means for Employers
For a business hiring at a $60,000 salary, choosing Texas over Wisconsin saves $395 per employee per year in employer-side payroll costs alone. For a team of 10, that's $3,950 annually — enough to fund an additional hire or significantly offset operating costs.
The biggest difference comes from SUTA (state unemployment tax) — Texas charges 1.5% on the first $9,000 vs Wisconsin's 2.8% on $14,000. The rate difference of 1.3 percentage points is significant because SUTA is levied on every employee and adjusts annually based on your unemployment claims history. Federal taxes — Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), and FUTA (0.6%) — are identical in both states and account for the majority of employer tax burden.
These numbers reflect employer-side costs only and don't include benefits, overhead, or the employee's own tax burden. Use the interactive Employee Cost Calculator to model different salary levels and benefits packages.
Choosing Between Texas and Wisconsin?
Cost alone favors Texas: At a $60K salary, you save $395 per employee — a real number that compounds across a growing team. At 20 employees, that's $7,900/year before factoring in any raises.
When Wisconsin might still make sense: If your business depends on talent concentrated in Wisconsin — tech workers, finance professionals, specialized trades — the labor market access may outweigh the payroll cost premium. Remote-friendly roles, however, make the $395/employee savings a strong argument for Texas-based registration.
What this comparison doesn't capture: State income tax (employee side) affects your offer competitiveness — employees in high-tax states need higher gross pay to net the same take-home. Texas has no state income tax; Wisconsin has state income tax. This affects what salary you need to offer to attract equivalent candidates.
State Employment Profiles
Texas
Texas has no state income tax, a minimal $9,000 SUTA wage base, and no paid family leave or disability insurance mandates — a primary reason it consistently ranks among the lowest employer-cost states.
energy & petrochemicals, technology (Austin/Dallas), financial services
Texas has absorbed massive corporate relocations from California (Tesla, Oracle, HP Enterprise); in Austin especially, California-level compensation expectations have followed these moves.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin has a moderate SUTA wage base and competitive workers' compensation costs, balancing its strong manufacturing base with a historically union-influenced labor market.
paper & printing, dairy processing, precision manufacturing & medical devices
Wisconsin's 2011 Act 10 significantly reduced public-sector union influence; the resulting wage gap between public and private sectors has shifted compensation benchmarks across the state.
Employer Environment in Each State
Key factors that shape employer costs beyond the numbers above
- No state income tax — employees keep more of their paycheck, a recruiting advantage
- SUTA rate 1.5% (wage base $9,000) — in line with national average
- Workers' comp rate 0.95% — near national average, varies by industry classification
- State income tax applies — factor into total compensation packages
- Above-average SUTA rate (2.8% on $14,000 wage base) — one of the higher state unemployment rates nationally
- Workers' comp rate 1.18% — near national average, varies by industry classification
Hiring Strategy Takeaway
The $395 per-employee cost gap at $60K salary is primarily driven by SUTA rates (TX: 1.5% vs WI: 2.8%). Texas's lack of state income tax also gives it a recruiting edge — employees take home more pay for equivalent salaries. For a growing business, this difference compounds quickly — a 10-person team in Texas costs $3,950 less annually than the same team in Wisconsin, before accounting for benefits, overhead, or salary-level differences.
Explore Each State
Cost Comparison at Different Salary Levels
How the gap changes from $30K to $150K
| Salary | TX Total | WI Total | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30,000 | $32,757 | $33,083 | -$326 |
| $40,000 | $43,617 | $43,966 | -$349 |
| $50,000 | $54,477 | $54,849 | -$372 |
| $60,000 | $65,337 | $65,732 | -$395 |
| $75,000 | $81,627 | $82,057 | -$430 |
| $100,000 | $108,777 | $109,264 | -$487 |
| $125,000 | $135,927 | $136,472 | -$545 |
| $150,000 | $163,077 | $163,679 | -$602 |
Click any amount to see the full cost breakdown for that salary and state. Amounts shown from the perspective of TX.
What About Startup Costs?
Hiring is one piece. See what it costs to actually open in these states.
Wisconsin
Simplify Payroll in Texas and Wisconsin
These providers handle tax calculations, filings, and compliance automatically.
All-in-one payroll, benefits, and HR. Automatically calculates and files federal, state, and local payroll taxes.
Payroll and tax filing for businesses of all sizes with built-in state-specific compliance.
Payroll, HR, and benefits in one platform. Handles multi-state employment and tax filings.
Some links may be affiliate links. CostCrunch may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Get notified when hiring costs change in these states
We track SUTA rates, workers' comp, and payroll taxes across all 50 states. Free updates.
More State Comparisons
Was this calculator helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve CostCrunch
Thank you for your feedback! ✓
Save Your Results
Download a professional PDF report with your complete analysis, charts, and key insights.
Download Your Report
Enter your email to get your personalized PDF report. We'll also send you useful financial tips.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
More Business Calculators
Break-Even Calculator
Find how many units to sell to cover costs
Employee Cost Calculator
Find the true cost of hiring an employee
Startup Cost Estimator
Estimate one-time and recurring startup costs
Profit Margin Calculator
Calculate gross, operating, and net margins
Self-Employment Tax Calculator
Estimate SE tax and quarterly payments for freelancers
Loan Comparison
Compare loan options side by side
Markup & Margin
Convert between markup and margin percentages
Payroll Tax Calculator
Estimate employer payroll taxes by state
Get notified when tax rates change
We monitor payroll tax rates, SUTA, and cost-of-living data across all 50 states. When rates change, we'll let you know. Free, no spam.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe with one click.